Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
September 3, 2010
Image Size
2.0 MB
Resolution
800×500
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
15,663 (1 today)
Favourites
142 (who?)
Comments
1,375
Downloads
130
×
i dont know if this was easy or hard XD
the one who can solve this must be very very good

i also that this kind of braintwisting is not much popular lol

its a crime mystery game
to those who love to solve riddles, mystery, brain teaser

difficulty level : medium

thanks to jester who help me in doing the flash :)
logic credit to @: WoW

Detective Shiki
:thumb201389654:

you can write the answer in comment section ^^

:police:
before you scroll down, the answer might be in the comment section

So far from all the comments only 5 have got it correctly XD
Add a Comment:
 
:iconwashishibo:
it was jack he said the killer went out the window last night but the carpet is dry and when you consider that the weather was bad last night that means it clearly was not opened until morning
Reply
:iconwhitekitsune1:
First of all, why would he be dressed up in his soccer field outfit inside of his office that early in the morning? Even if it had been done at night, there would be no reason to be dressed up to go play soccer during a storm at night. I believe the victim was called over by his colleague Jack, possibly that morning since it would be a clear day, great for going out and practicing some kicks. It wouldn't be uncommon for them to play in wet grass or even mud for that matter, even more so if the sun had dried up most of the water that fell last night.

From what I can see from the room, there is what looks to be a contract of sorts and a book next to that. There are also some trophies in the back. I believe the contract was placed there after the murder to try and set someone else up to look like the murderer as to throw off the suspicion from their self. Although I can't see the word on it too well, I believe the book next to the contract might have been a book related to the two team mates and was the lure that called him to the original crime scene, where the murderer was already waiting for him with the weapon in hand, which was later placed next to the contract on the desk to further help their case.

This being the case, the victim will have no doubt have not seen the act coming and was taken by suprise from behind and was stabbed three times viciously in the chest from behind. He probably held him there in his arm for a few moments as he bled, causing the blood trail to flow down his shirt, and then let him go, making the blood flow down his side causing the abnormal flow of blood down the front of his shirt later after it dried. The fact that the room is free from blood splatter and still rather tidy will be my evidence to help prove this theory. Because he attacked him from behind, he would not have gotten any blood on his own clothes if he had just held him there as he passed away, if he hadn't died from the first stab. If he was still alive after the three initial stabs, he might have been too shocked from his friend's actions that he did not fight back. Cleaning blood off of his hands and arms would be simple enough, even more so if he had worn gloves or something of the like.

The story of the man in the window at night was more than likely made up, whether the murder had occurred at night or early that morning. If it had happened at night, when he had opened the window, rain and wind would most likely enter the room and cause some distortion and damage, leaving behind evidence that this indeed was the case. But there is no sign of that happening. All we have is Jack's word of this, which as this point is flimsy at best. He said he waited until morning because he was afraid the man was still waiting for him out in the dark, which again is a flimsy story. He could have still called the police while he was there despite his cowardice. Even had he not waited, the suspicious person in his story might have seen him and thought it best to silence anyone who saw him to begin with and would have come back either way.

The soccer ball and both of their uniforms are very clean, being an outdoor sport, which leads me to believe this all occurred in the morning. Jack would be the number one suspect on my list as he has made claims that can be proven false and seems to show no remorse over his fallen team mate. Jack must have placed him in that chair after he killed him and the blood dried up, which explains why there are no blood stains anywhere in the room.

I hope I at least got most of it right. I'm not Conan, but I try to at least see the small details like he says you should do when trying to solve a case. ^_^ Even if it seems insignificant at first, it could be the one piece of evidence that cracks the case wide open!
Reply
:icontcwoua:
tcwoua May 21, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
hi, first of all, thank you for writing these all, but i didnt saw any mention of evidence , hehe, so you didnt get the right answer :)
Reply
:iconwhitekitsune1:
Yeah, I did forget some details, but I did use evidence to explain my findings. The pen was obviously the weapon of choice as it's covered in blood sitting on the table. The window had to have been opened that morning. (just adding those since I forgot to mention them before.) I also forgot to mention the witness's comment about him seeing the murderer's silhouette going out the window. That would have to mean he was behind him in the same house when it happened. It wouldn't have been that dark in the room for him to of only seen a silhouette if the victim had been in there signing a contract. And even if someone else was the killer, I'm sure they wouldn't have neatly set the weapon back down on the desk neatly beside the paper if they were in a hurry, so it had to have been someone who was inside the house the whole time.

The only one who had the time to make sure everything was neatly placed and set up to look like an intruder had entered could only be Jack, who had been there the whole night waiting inside the house. Had he of called the Police that night his trick would have been figured out on the spot by the police, so he waited until morning to open the window to back up his story. He made too many mistakes when coming up with his story.
Reply
:icontcwoua:
tcwoua May 21, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
any one can wait in the house before the crime , so its no telling that jack did it , there is no evidence that youve mentioned that jack is the one who did it :)
Reply
:iconwhitekitsune1:
Isn't that his soccer ball at the scene?
Reply
:icontcwoua:
tcwoua May 23, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
yes, its either jack or victims belonging, we dont know right? :)
Reply
:iconwhitekitsune1:
That's why I asked is to get more information. ^_^ I read on one of the other comments that you said the calender and the papers on the desk were irrelevant, is that true? Also, this room belongs to the victim, yes? The question is why was he here in the middle of the night in his soccer uniform in the middle of a storm. My question for Jack would be why was he over at the victim's home, if it is his home, in his soccer uniform at night during a storm?

If someone else had come through the home and attacked the victim he would have left a trail of mud and water on the floor when he ran through and killed him and then let in more water when he opened the window to leave that night, yes? They would have had to come through the front door as the window would more than likely had been locked from the inside and since there is no broken glass, the only other option is the door. I also didn't hear of any signs of a break in so the suspect must have been someone the victim knew.

So considering the room is clean and there doesn't seem to be any signs of a struggle, the only obvious answer is that Jack is the murderer. And even if there had been signs of a struggle and blood placed anywhere, he had the entire night to clean it up as he admitted he didn't call the police until morning because he was afraid the murderer was still outside waiting for him. Even if the murder weapon was tested for finger prints and came up negative for any, we can assume he wore gloves while doing this, he still has no valid alliby and the evidence of this case is stacked against his flimsy story.

Since I don't know much of their background, I can only assume the motive for this murder was jealousy. As with most of these types of cases, the victim was number one and the suspect was number two. Meaning if he took out the victim, he would become the new number one and get all the shiny trophies, contracts, girls, yadda yadda...lol Anyway, you get my drift.

(Sorry for spamming all this, but I am not one to give up easily until I have exhausted everything I have X3)
Reply
:icontcwoua:
tcwoua May 23, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
hehe, all the evidence where right in front of you, im pretty sure its all in that shortclip :)
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconbreezyflake:
The window was open, wasn't it? Isn't that kind of odd? It was a storm last night, so the victim should have closed the window. That means the killer went through the front door, THEN opened the window to get out.

And the only person who could have went in through the front door without any hassle should've been Jack.

Plus, if the killer went out through the front door easily, he should have went out using the front door.

*my deduction's wrong, and I know it. lemme try again haha*
Reply
Add a Comment: